Love of All Wisdom

As of today, Love of All Wisdom is one year old; the blog went officially online on 1 June 2009. To commemorate the occasion I’ve added a list of “favourite posts” to the sidebar. These are five posts from the past year that I consider particularly successful: they got a fascinating discussion going, attracted new readers to the blog, and helped me think through my own views more deeply. If you’re relatively new to the blog, have a look.

But more importantly than any new widget, I wanted to take this opportunity to say thank you to all my readers who have followed my philosophical interests this year. And an extra special thank you to everyone who has left a comment and enriched the wonderful, lively and growing discussions going on here. Without all of you readers, the blog is no more than another personal journal of mine, and I have more than enough of those offline. Thank you all very much, and here’s to many more years.

A few months ago, I requested to have this blog reviewed at a site devoted to reviewing blogs, in the interest of getting some honest feedback and improving it. (Note: if you don’t like profanity, you will not be fond of this site, beginning with the URL.) The review got posted today, and seems generally more positive than most of the reviews on the site, so I’m pretty happy with it. (I’m also getting a lot of hits from readers of that site – welcome!) If you’re a regular reader, you might find the review interesting; and if you have any taste for philosophical puns, you should definitely check out the comments on the review.

But I would also like to hear readers’ opinions on a couple of the reviewer’s comments. First, (s?)he notes that the blog is difficult for a lay reader to follow. This is a balance I knew would be hard to strike from the beginning. I wanted to make it complex enough that professional philosophers and religionists would find it valuable, but also simple enough that a nonspecialist audience could follow along. I’m wondering if I’ve pitched it a bit too far in the first direction. What do you think? Should I try to simplify future posts more than I have been?

Second – and this is more for those of you who read the blog at the site, rather than by email or in an RSS reader – the reviewer hates the white-on-black look of the blog. The reviewer thinks that, while this might be pretty to look at at first glance, it creates eyestrain after one tries to read the site for long period of time. I am hoping to make some changes to the blog’s workings in the not-so-distant future, and this could be among them. But what do you think? Does the white on black work, or not?

I imagine you’ve noticed that Sanskrit diacritical marks on this site (like the first two letters in “??ntideva”) are currently being replaced with question marks. In case you’re wondering, this is not a problem with your browser or computer; everyone is seeing this, including me. This is one of the screwups I mentioned resulting from my transition to a new server. It is proving one of the more difficult to fix – especially as I am currently in the middle of marking my students’ essays and exams, which leaves me little time to explore the niceties of PHP and MySQL to find a solution to the problem. Rest assured that I am working on the problem and will fix it, but please bear with me in the meantime.

Well, the move to a new server is clearly not proceeding as smoothly as I’d hoped. A lot of things are broken on the site right now. I am working on fixing them as fast as I can, and I beg your patience in the meantime.

Over the next couple days I’m going to be trying to move loveofallwisdom.com to a new, and less shady, server. I’m hoping the site should be up uninterrupted during this time, but given how I’ve been treated by JustHost so far, there may be some hiccups in the process.

If you tried to access the blog late last night or early this morning, you might have got a message that “this account has been suspended.” My hosting service, JustHost, apparently decided I had too much CPU usage (on a text site that gets 50-70 page views a day). This happened right after I installed that “possibly related posts” plugin, so I deleted it immediately. I’m hoping that will help, and will try and follow a couple of their tips to keep that from happening again.

But when my yearly contract with JustHost runs out in a couple months, I don’t intend on using them again. They didn’t give me any warning about this, and their email tried to say that because of the high CPU usage I need to move my account to a dedicated server – a shift in cost from $4 a month to $150 a month. They also continually try to “upsell” me, getting me to pay for more services I don’t want. My best impression is that all this is because they’re a gimmicky cheapie service, offering a price (the aforementioned $4 a month) that’s too good to be true. I want to move my service to somewhere I pay a bit more but get treated honestly. (If I’m starting to use too much of your resources, give me a warning, and then let me move up to a different plan that costs a little more than the previous one.)

Readers, do any of you have self-hosted blogs? If you do, what hosting service do you use? How long have you used it? Are you satisfied with it? Have you had problems like this?

I just installed a new WordPress plugin that recommends other recent posts related to the current one, based on similarities in categories. (You’ll see this at the bottom of each post on the site.) I’m trying to decide how useful it is. It generally seems to want to pick posts that are very recent (the last couple weeks); I’d prefer it to go a bit deeper so it’s more useful to people who are discovering the site through a link. I might try and edit the plugin so that it sorts on a different criterion. Or just keep it as is, or delete it. Any opinions?

I just saw a screening of Examined Life, Astra Taylor’s movie about philosophy. It’s a little surprising in the first place to see a movie about philosophy (as opposed to a movie that expresses philosophical ideas, of which there are many). But there’s something about the film that’s in its way even more surprising: although all of the eight philosophers in the film is a professor, only one (Kwame Anthony Appiah) is actually a professor of philosophy. Two of them (Martha Nussbaum and Peter Singer) have minor appointments in philosophy, where they might teach a few philosophy classes on the side but most of their work is done elsewhere. The majority, however, have no current official association with academic philosophy whatsoever. They’re in departments of French and Italian, rhetoric, sociology – anything but philosophy. This despite the fact that every large university and nearly every small college has a philosophy department, full of people who consider themselves philosophers. The film makes no comment on the fact.
(continue reading…)

Just a quick note of celebration: the Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy has just published my article on ??ntideva! If you’ve been wondering what the deal is with this ??ntideva guy I keep talking about, the article should be a good introduction.

The IEP website looks like it’s just undergone a snappy redesign, too. If the last time you visited was several months ago, have another look.

For the first half of next week I’ll be heading to the annual conference of the Society for Asian and Comparative Philosophy – a sort of retreat at Asilomar Conference Grounds in California. It’s my first time attending the SACP, and I’m not sure whether I’ll have time to blog while out there – hopefully I’ll be spending all my time either at talks or talking to other philosophers. I’m not even sure there’s an Internet connection. But one way or another it should provide a lot of fascinating food for thought, which I hope to blog about either during or after the event.